Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Canadian Journal of School Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chafouleas, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Chanese, J. A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Generating Usable Knowledge

Initial Development and Validation of the Usage Rating Profile for Interventions (URP-I)

Sandra M. Chafouleas

University of Connecticut, sandra.chafouleas{at}uconn.edu

T. Chris Riley-Tillman

East Carolina University

Amy M. Briesch

University of Connecticut

Julie A.M. Chanese

University of Connecticut

Dans cette étude, une mesure auto-evaluative de l'application des interventions appelée « Profile de classement d'usage des interventions » (Usage Rating Profile for Interventions, URP-I) a été développée et examinée par rapport à la structure factorielle et la cohérence interne. Les résultats soutiennent l'idée selon laquelle l'emploi de l'intervention est associé à au moins quatre conceptions différentes, et qu'une mesure comprenant 25 éléments pourrait fournir un index fiable de ces quatre facteurs. Ceux-ci incluent l'acceptabilité, la connaissance, la faisabilité et l'intégrité. Les résultats élargissent et intègrent le travail existant sur l'acceptabilité visant à prévoir l'usage de ces interventions. Les implications de cette mesure, ainsi que ses limites et quelques directions futures sont élaborées dans cet article.

Canadian Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 2, 175-189 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0829573508323989
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chafouleas, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Chanese, J. A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?