Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Canadian Journal of School Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0829573508316589v1
23/1/11    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prince-Embury, S.
Right arrow Articles by Courville, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparison of One-, Two-, and Three-Factor Models of Personal Resiliency Using the Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents

Sandra Prince-Embury

Resiliency Institute of Allenhurst LLC

Troy Courville

Pearson

This article examines the scale structure of the Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents (RSCA). Confirmatory factor analysis reveals that a three-factor model is a better fit than one- or two-factor models for the normative sample. These findings lend support to the construct validity of the RSCA. The three-factor model is discussed as a framework that is useful in systematically relating critical aspects of resiliency in children and adolescents for the purpose of clinical intervention.

Key Words: resiliency • factor structure • mastery • relatedness • emotional reactivity

This version was published on June 1, 2008

Canadian Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 11-25 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0829573508316589
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Canadian Journal of School PsychologyHome page
S. Prince-Embury
The Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents as Related to Parent Education Level and Race/Ethnicity in Children
Canadian Journal of School Psychology, June 1, 2009; 24(2): 167 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian Journal of School PsychologyHome page
S. Prince-Embury
Translating Resiliency Theory for Assessment and Application in Schools
Canadian Journal of School Psychology, June 1, 2008; 23(1): 4 - 10.
[PDF]

Home page
 Canadian Journal of School PsychologyHome page
S. Prince-Embury and T. Courville
Measurement Invariance of the Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents With Respect to Sex and Age Cohorts
Canadian Journal of School Psychology, June 1, 2008; 23(1): 26 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian Journal of School PsychologyHome page
S. Prince-Embury
The Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents, Psychological Symptoms, and Clinical Status in Adolescents
Canadian Journal of School Psychology, June 1, 2008; 23(1): 41 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian Journal of School PsychologyHome page
L. G. Weiss
Toward the Mastery of Resiliency
Canadian Journal of School Psychology, June 1, 2008; 23(1): 127 - 137.
[Abstract] [PDF]