This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Watkins, M. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Diagnostic Utility of WISC-III Subtest Variability among Students with Learning Disabilities

The Pennsylvania State University

Psychologists have long conjectured that Wechsler subtest variability may be an indicator of learning disability. Research on intersubtest scatter (range) with previous Wechsler scales indicated that scatter could not reliably discriminate between disabled and nondisabled children. The Profile Variability Index (PVI) also failed to demonstrate adequate diagnostic utility with the WISC-R. The present study assessed the diagnostic utility of subtest variability indices on the WISC-III by comparing 684 student with learning disabilities to the 2,200 children in the standardization sample. Results of Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analyses indicated that WISC-III subtest variability as quantified by range and variance exhibited no diagnostic utility in distinguishing between children with learning disabilities and children from the standardization sample. It was concluded that interpretation of WISC-III subtest variability has no place in the scientific practice of school psychology.

Canadian Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 11-20 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/082957359901500102


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?